Totally agree, once you have a template that works you stop wasting time guessing. It also keeps the output consistent, just tweak the details instead of starting over. 
Nowadays I feel stuck, because I have several ideas but find it hard to prioritize which one to go with next. I am curious to see how your audience need matching prompt could work.
Another great idea is analyzing the average performer posts along with the good performers. I never thought about adding the average performers, but I see how it could add really valuable, tangible feedback on some patterns. Thank you for sharing!🩷🦩
The average vs. top performer comparison is sneaky powerful. You stop asking "what made this good?" and start asking "what made this one worse?" Different question. Better answers.
This is phenomenal advice. I just asked Chat to review my website and the advice I received is incredible! I can’t wait to give it a much needed total overhaul. Thank you 🙏🤗
I have been doing a similar thing, except I don't have a content calendar etc, but I have a library containing an entire framework I'm developing and everything I've been researching (not to mention analyses of weird dreams / songs etc). So reverse engineering articles is really easy in that situation. I would say the more of your life / personality/ social issues you care about you feed it, the more ideas for output you get. It's limitless
Working backwards from a good result is way easier than guessing the perfect prompt.
You end up with a clear template you can reuse, so the output stays steady and you waste less time.
The template thing is underrated. Once you've extracted what works, you're not starting from zero every time. Compounds fast.
Totally agree, once you have a template that works you stop wasting time guessing. It also keeps the output consistent, just tweak the details instead of starting over. 
I love these Nick.
Nowadays I feel stuck, because I have several ideas but find it hard to prioritize which one to go with next. I am curious to see how your audience need matching prompt could work.
Another great idea is analyzing the average performer posts along with the good performers. I never thought about adding the average performers, but I see how it could add really valuable, tangible feedback on some patterns. Thank you for sharing!🩷🦩
The average vs. top performer comparison is sneaky powerful. You stop asking "what made this good?" and start asking "what made this one worse?" Different question. Better answers.
Context is the key. Prompt “engineering” is secondary. Agreed.
Context in, quality out. The prompt just points it in a direction.
This is phenomenal advice. I just asked Chat to review my website and the advice I received is incredible! I can’t wait to give it a much needed total overhaul. Thank you 🙏🤗
This is part 1 of a 3 part series. Next Installment drops this evening. 🙌
I have been doing a similar thing, except I don't have a content calendar etc, but I have a library containing an entire framework I'm developing and everything I've been researching (not to mention analyses of weird dreams / songs etc). So reverse engineering articles is really easy in that situation. I would say the more of your life / personality/ social issues you care about you feed it, the more ideas for output you get. It's limitless
Dream analyses and song breakdowns as AI context is beautifully unhinged and I mean that as the highest compliment.
Most people give AI a style guide. You gave it your subconscious. That's a power move.