When copy writers hit Substack, often their writing voice is as dull as dishwater! I get it but oooof. Glad you found your writing soul, Nick!
About to try the Voiceprint!
Favourite argument with Claude atm is "Dallas, this is not your voice. It's too soft." Apparently, it takes the "edge of sass" project instruction quite literally. Still teaching the bot that not everything needs to be edgy and sometimes yes, I decide to speak more softly... 🫨
When copy writers hit Substack, often their writing voice is as dull as dishwater! I get it but oooof. Glad you found your writing soul, Nick!
About to try the Voiceprint!
Favourite argument with Claude atm is "Dallas, this is not your voice. It's too soft." Apparently, it takes the "edge of sass" project instruction quite literally. Still teaching the bot that not everything needs to be edgy and sometimes yes, I decide to speak more softly... 🫨
The irony: you gave it clear voice instructions, and now it's policing you with them.
"This is not your voice" when you're the one who defined the voice.
Welcome to the calibration loop. (It gets better.)
Starting to think that Nick Quick is a name that AI came up with. Speaking to the Voiceprint bot: am I right?
While my birth certificate says my first name is actually Nicholas, I can assure you my “made-up sounding” name is real 🤗
You have an awesome name.
It is now. Not so much for “kindergarten Nick” 😜
Let's say it's aging like a good wine, and now coincidentally matching the theme of your Substack.